Uncategorized

Week 3 Discussion

Please no plagiarism and make sure you are able to access all resource on your own before you bid. One of the references must come from James, R. K., & Gilliland, B. E. (2017). I have attached several documents that you will need to complete this discussion. Please follow the instructions to get full credit for the discussion. I need this completed by 09/11/18 at 7pm. 

Discussion: TAF Assessment

When providing a clinical assessment for clients, several colleagues may work with the same client and come up with varying perceptions of how the client is functioning. It is essential to work collaboratively with colleagues to provide the best client care. You need to be able to provide a respectful rationale to defend your assessment as well as be open to varying perspectives to come to a consensus on the best way to move forward with the client based on this assessment process.

For this Discussion, you will examine a case study of a mock client and determine the client care needs for this client.

To Prepare:

· Review the case study of a mock client and The TAF Form found in this week’s Learning Resources.

· Complete The TAF Form for the mock client in the case study and select one scale for this Discussion.

By Day 3 

Post your scoring of the mock client in the case study and explain the rationale of what information you assessed to that scoring in order to defend your position.

Required Resources

Readings

James, R. K., & Gilliland, B. E. (2017). Crisis intervention strategies (8th ed.). Boston, MA: Cengage Learning. Chapter 2, “Culturally      Effective Helping in Crisis” Chapter 3, “The Intervention      and Assessment Models” Chapter 7, “Posttraumatic Stress Disorder”

Document: The Triage Assessment Form (TAF) (Word document)

Document: Case Study: Amy (PDF)

Optional Resources

American Psychiatric Association. (2017). Clinical practice guideline for the treatment of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Retrieved from http://www.apa.org/ptsd-guideline/ 

Hatala, A. R. (2013). Towards a biopsychosocial–spiritual approach in health psychology: Exploring theoretical orientations and future directions. Journal of Spirituality in Mental Health, 15(4), 256–276. doi:10.1080/19349637.2013.776448

National Child Traumatic Stress Network. (n.d.-c). Trauma-informed screening & assessment. Retrieved March 2, 2018, from http://www.nctsn.org/resources/topics/trauma-informed-screening-assessment 

Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA). (2014). Trauma-informed care in behavioral health services. Treatment Improvement Protocol (TIP) Series 57. Retrieved from https://store.samhsa.gov/shin/content/SMA14-4816/SMA14-4816.pdf  Chapter      3, “Understanding the Impact of Trauma” Chapter      4, “Screening and Assessment”

Wilson, C., Lonsway, K. A., Archambault, J., & Hopper, J. (2016). Understanding the neurobiology of trauma and implications for interviewing victims. End Violence Against Women International. Retrieved from https://www.evawintl.org/Library/DocumentLibraryHandler.ashx?id=842

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Uncategorized

Week 3 Discussion

Week 3 Discussion

Description:

Water is one of the most important elements on our planet. The majority of our bodies are made up of water. In its purest form water has a molarity of 55M.

Instructions:

Write a response to the following prompt and reply to at least two of your peers initial posts.

Prompt:

On a planet with different gravity, would the Molarity of water be different? Explain your reasoning.

What to submit: 

Individual Response: Post needs to be between 200-250 words. Pay attention to clarity, organization of ideas, and grammar. Please cover all topics in the prompt.

IF YOU NEED HELP WITH THIS ASSIGNMENT OR A SIMILAR ONE PLEASE PLACE YOUR ORDER TODAY AND GET A DISCOUNT