Uncategorized

MGMT 565 Week 1-7 Discussion Group 4Discussions M3L2 Discussion 6: Heidi Roizen case – MGMT 565 Week 1-7

M3L2 Discussion 6: Heidi Roizen case – MGMT 565 Week 1-7 Discussion Group 4

From Section Merge: MGMT 565 SP20, Section 001 & 102: Power & Influence

6 unread replies. 17 replies.

This is a group discussion. You should review the readings associated with this module (including the assigned case if applicable) before participating in this discussion. In your initial post, please provide your responses to/analysis of the below questions. After you post your response(s) you will then have access to your group members’ postings–please respond to/comment on a minimum of two other group members’ posts.

Your initial post and subsequent comments will be graded based on the Discussion Rubric. To access this rubric, click the three dot icon and choose “show rubric.”  Please add your initial post by Wednesday at midnight, and then respond to peers by midnight on Saturday. Initial postings will be marked down per day late after Wednesday; responses posted after Saturday will not be graded.

Please answer the following (in a max of 500 words total):

    1. Assess Roizen’s network from the standpoint of “mutual understanding” and “mutual benefit” as discussed in the readings for this week (i.e., Baker, Hoffman & Casnocha): does she use these principles effectively?
    2. The two main forms of power/influence that derive from networks comes from network centrality and brokerage. Does Roizen benefit from one, the other, or both, of these?