Blog
M1 Discussion 1: Defining Power and Influence
Order with us to get orignal papers!
M1 Discussion 1: Defining Power and Influence
This is a whole-class discussion and you will be graded on your participation. You should review the readings associated with this module (including the assigned case if applicable) before participating in this discussion. In your initial post, please provide your responses to/analysis of the below questions. After you post your response(s) you will then have access to your classmates’ postings–please respond to/comment on a minimum of two other students’ posts.
Your initial post and subsequent comments will be graded based on the Discussion Rubric. To access this rubric, click the three dot icon and choose “show rubric.” Please add your initial post by Wednesday at midnight, and then respond to peers by midnight on Saturday. Initial postings will be marked down per day late after Wednesday; responses posted after Saturday will not be graded.
Questions:
- How do the definitions of “power” and “influence” in the assigned course materials compare to what you normally think about, feel and associate with these terms?
- How is”power and influence” different from exercising “leadership”?
M1 SR Assignment 1: Your Success Qualities
Self reflection papers should be no longer than 1-page in length (single spaced, 12 point font, one inch margins). Please ensure that you answer all of the questions asked, and are using appropriate grammar, mechanics and citations/reference as appropriate to the question. This assignment will be graded based upon the Reflections Rubric. See below. Late assignments will be marked down one full grade per day after the due date. This assignment will be kept confidential and will not be shared with others under any circumstances.
Prompt: Write a self-reflection about those aspects of your personality, skills, abilities, and “character” that you value highly and believe have made you effective in rising to your current position and in being an effective leader.
M2L1 Discussion 2: Keith Ferrazzi case – MGMT 565 Week 1-7 Discussion Group 4
This is a group discussion. You should review the readings associated with this module (including the assigned case if applicable) before participating in this discussion. In your initial post, please provide your responses to/analysis of the below questions. After you post your response(s) you will then have access to your group members’ postings–please respond to/comment on a minimum of two other group members’ posts.
Your initial post and subsequent comments will be graded based on the Discussion Rubric. To access this rubric, click the three dot icon and choose “show rubric.” Please add your initial post by Wednesday at midnight, and then respond to peers by midnight on Saturday. Initial postings will be marked down per day late after Wednesday; responses posted after Saturday will not be graded.
Questions:
Describe Keith Ferrazzi in terms of the personal qualities, motivations, and behaviors that distinguish him and that he has relied upon to build his career in terms of:
- how have they been generally beneficial to his success
- how have they been generally detrimental to his success.
Using the “power outcome” framework introduced in the last class (i.e., compliance, commitment, resistance), what is the outcome of his power/influence at Deloitte with respect to:
- his peers/subordinates?
- his superiors (i.e., Loconto (CEO)/Friedman (partner))?
- In explaining both, please be sure to do so with respect to how his personal qualities, motivations, and behaviors help explain these outcomes
Self reflection papers should be no longer than 1-page in length (single spaced, 12 point font, one inch margins). Please ensure that you answer all of the questions asked, and are using appropriate grammar, mechanics and citations/reference as appropriate to the question. This assignment will be graded based upon the Reflections Rubric. See below. Late assignments will be marked down one full grade per day after the due date. This assignment will be kept confidential and will not be shared with others under any circumstances.
Prompt: Rate yourself on the following attributes as described in the Pfeffer book (Ch. 2) and the McGinn & Lingo article: Ambition, Energy/Stamina, Focus, Confidence, Humility/Deference, Self-reflective, Tolerance for Conflict, Empathy/Sensitivity. Rate yourself on a 1-5 scale (where 5 means you possess a lot of the attribute and 1 means you possess little of it). Also, please ask someone that knows you well (and hopefully someone you can trust to be truthful with you) to rate you on these attributes. Please provide the ratings as well as write a very brief description of your self-assessment on each of the attributes. Were there differences in your assessments as compared to the ones you received from the person you asked? If so, what do you think of these? How do these compare to the qualities and attributes you discussed in the last individual writing assignment?
Order with us to get orignal papers!
M2L2 Discussion 3: Zia Yusuf at SAP case – MGMT 565 Week 1-7 Discussion Group 4
Questions:
What individual qualities/attributes/competencies have helped Yusuf be so successful at SAP? Assess the degree to which these qualities gave Yusuf expert power [Hint: think about the context: Why did Hasso Plattner hire him?]
Did leading the CCT unit enhanced Yusuf’s power/influence? [Hint: draw on the Yukl/Pfeffer readings for this week in answering these questions]
M2L2 SR Assignment 3: McClelland Motivation Needs
than 1-page in length (single spaced, 12 point font, one inch margins). Please ensure that you answer all of the questions asked, and are using appropriate grammar, mechanics and citations/reference as appropriate to the question. This assignment will be graded based upon the Reflections Rubric. See below. Late assignments will be marked down one full grade per day after the due date. This assignment will be kept confidential and will not be shared with others under any circumstances.
Prompt:
- Complete and score the McClelland Motivation Needs Instrument (Links to an external site.)—you will need to print this out and score it yourself.
- Second, please report your scores on each of the above instruments.
- Briefly, what are your reactions to your scores on these different attributes (and refer back to the readings on these motivation needs from last week’s lesson)?
- What do these mean for your managerial profile?