1 Discussion 03 Name Institution Course Number and Title Professor Date Discussion

1

Discussion 03

Name

Institution

Course Number and Title

Professor

Date

Discussion 03

What entails the implementation stage in consultation? What are some key factors that would make this stage successful?

During consultation, implementation is a critical stage that determines the outcomes of the process. In particular, the stage is characterized by applying and executing previous choices. According to Dougherty (2014), whether implementation succeeds depends on the decisions the parties involved make. The author’s statement illuminates how each action taken shapes results, and to understand what is required, consultants must understand what to do. For example, a consultant’s intervention is a central element that shapes success. Dougherty (2014) argues that participants must select interventions with an increased probability for positive outcomes, especially a proven and evidence-based intervention. It becomes challenging for consultation to present constructive results when the intervention chosen does not align with the process or the nature of the people involved in the activity. Another considerable factor impacting implementation is establishing a relevant plan emphasizing key objectives, time frames, procedures, and responsible parties (Dougherty, 2014). Factors such as consultee flexibility, reassurance, and technical assistance are vital when implementing the formulated plan. These elements ensure integrity during implementation and make evaluation based on anticipated outcomes easier.

What is the role of evaluation in consultation?

Evaluating the consultation process is an imperative procedure that must executed to create a foundation for optimal outcomes and analysis. According to Dougherty (2014), evaluation allows process determination and understanding consultation consequences. For example, when a consultant completes implementing decisions, assessing consultation ensures they know its effects and what to do to enhance it in the future. In addition, evaluating it creates foundations of service improvements and accountability (Dougherty, 2014). The author demonstrates that analyzing consultation offers a well-detailed account for elevating the process and ensuring each participant is held responsible. Furthermore, an in-depth evaluation of the consultation process lays the groundwork for increased knowledge regarding the consultation discipline and what is required to succeed. In other words, conducting formative or summative evaluations presents feedback that can be used to make consultation more successful.

Reference

Dougherty, A. M. (2014). Psychological consultation and collaboration in school and community settings (6th ed.). Cengage Learning.