Discussion

Should somebody fall?         

            Somebody should not fall if the breach cannot be wholly associated with them. For one to fall, the sequence of occurrences that prompted the loss ought to depict utter reckless on their positions. As such, if the individual responsible has been vigilant on the potential threats, they ought to be spared and advised to improve their mode of operations. Effective measures ought to be employed within the ICT department to caution it from potential instances of a breach. Companies ought to focus on emphasizing for timely recovery of the systems before a lot of mess is realized rather than advocating for a fall.

             Presently, cyber-attacks are quite prevalent. Therefore ICT personnel’s ought to be on the lookout to counter potential attacks as they ought to be held accountable upon a breach. The argument seeks to disregard the Idea of a CEO falling out for misconduct done in the ICT department to prove a point. Therefore, justice ought to be the determinant of who falls out and who is to be retained.

            Falling out of an individual who never inflicted the loss implies creation of different loophole on top of the existent ones. As a result, the numbers of institutions that need to be addressed are increased. Again, the individual who might be in a better position in addressing the breach quits hence intensifying the issue.in this case, the fallout of the CEO adds management issue to the problem of cybersecurity. On the other hand, falling out of the individual who caused the loss shows enhanced accountability and saving on potential losses on data, funds, subscribers and aspects of credibility.

From statistics, 85% of customers whose information were hacked in this case vowed to influence others against the company (Seijts, 2015). The implication is that the volume of sales will be affected despite the fall. As such, working on the cause of the breach and emphasizing compliance would be more effective than a compulsory fall out.

WE’VE HAD A GOOD SUCCESS RATE ON THIS ASSIGNMENT. PLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH PapersSpot AND GET AN AMAZING DISCOUNT

Reference

Seijts, J. (2015, May 8). Case Study: After a Crisis, Who Should Take the Fall? Retrieved October 12, 2019, from Harvard Business Review website: https://hbr.org/2015/05/case-study-after-a-crisis-who-should-take-the-fall

‌

If someone takes the fall – does it make sense? 

            When someone takes the fall, it makes a lot of sense. The act depicts that an individual takes upon themselves to pay the price for the inconveniences that happened. However, the strategy ought to be done on just grounds. The individual whose department afflicted loss by failing to respond in time should be held accountable. The management should conduct a thorough evaluation of the activities that triggered the breach to avoid summoning the wrong person. Taking a fall voluntarily after failing in mode of execution of operations is an illustration of individual responsibility.

            When the right staff takes a fall, and the announcement about it reaches the users of the company’s service, they morale to continue transacting with the company is retained. Customers may tend to attach the changes made as geared towards addressing the previous breach. As a result, they assume that the issue is permanently wiped off. The remaining management team is left with a boosted morale on sealing the loopholes that may trigger the occurrence of a similar incident. However, the activity may create fear and suspicion among members of staff, prompting some to reassign for fear of the same case. On the public relation perspective, the initiative allows the company to uphold its initial reputation or develop a more appealing one that created during the breach.

            Moreover, companies may suffer from loss of talent in the event of one falling out. The rationale is that highly targeted institutions are those whose volume of output has attained levels that are deemed as desirable. The staff of these companies re professionally trained and talented thus, the company may suffer reduced workforce in case a staff member falls. In this case, for instance, the resignation of the CEO, Jake, leaves the company with a deficiency in a sector that never inflicted the breach.

What would you do if you were Jake?

            If I were Jake, I would also resign. The decision is an act of responsibility for management. Additionally, it depicts the idea of placing the position ahead of personal interests. Since the CEO in most instances is the image of the company, the resignation would imply new initiatives. The resignation thus creates an original vision of the company. As a result, the retained customers are convinced about better performances than before. Again, upon the resignation of a CEO after a bad scenario, the reputation of a company is quickly and successfully rebuild. Jake understood the role of his position as the company brand and prudently utilized it. His idea is justified as the company customers would think that new management has been established to inhibit threatening situations.