Uncategorized

The goal for this assignment is: You will be reviewing and writing about what

The goal for this assignment is: You will be reviewing and
writing about what you learned from several web articles
pertaining to plagiarism and historical research. In doing so,
you should follow several rules:

A.Do not use quotes. I want to see how you review and learn
points of emphasis from these research articles. Put
information into your own words, and utilize your own
informed analysis to address the assignment topics.

B.Focus on drafting your thoughts in a way that avoids
grammar issues that can weaken your final answers. These
issues to avoid include things like: incorrectly spelled words,
poorly structured sentences, improper word usage, improper
capitalization of words, improper comma or period
placement, and other errors of this nature.

Turn this assignment in as a single word doc.

This assignment requires using a minimum and
maximum word count range. This is often a part of the
drafting process of college level research assignments. You
can find the word counts for both parts of the assignment
later in this instructional handout.

PART ONE:
Review the 3 assigned articles on historical resources and
plagiarism. In 125 to 250 words in length, and completely in
your own words, give your overall impressions and analysis
of what you learned about how to properly utilize historical
research sources and avoid plagiarism from these articles.

PART TWO:
In 100 to 200 words in length, and completely in your own
words, provide what you learned, your insight, and
impressions from the following historical research article
entitled: “Origins”

Finally to structure your answers all you need to do is
type a heading that says Part One, and then underneath that
heading type out your brief discussion answer for that
portion of the assignment. Then, do the same for Part Two
of the assignment. These brief headings will allow me to
differentiate your respective answers. Nothing else is
required from an editorial structure setup standpoint.