Discussion: Cognitive Behavioral Therapy: Group Settings Versus Family Settings

In your role, it is essential to understand these differences to appropriately apply this therapeutic approach across multiple settings. For this Discussion, as you compare the use of CBT in group settings and family settings, consider challenges of using this approach with your own groups. To prepare: Reflect on your practicum experiences with CBT in group and family settings. Post an explanation of how the use of CBT in groups compares to its use in family settings. Provide specific examples from your own practicum experiences. Then, explain at least two challenges counselors might encounter when using CBT in the group setting. Support your response with specific examples from this week’s media. Learning Resources Required Readings Yalom, I. D., & Leszcz, M. (2005). The theory and practice of group psychotherapy (5th ed.). New York, NY: Basic Books. Chapter 11, “In the Beginning” (pp. 309–344) Yalom, I. D., & Leszcz, M. (2005). The theory and practice of group psychotherapy (5th ed.). New York, NY: Basic Books. Chapter 12, “The Advanced Group” (pp. 345–390) American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Washington, DC: Author. Bjornsson, A. S., Bidwell, L. C., Brosse, A. L., Carey, G., Hauser, M., Mackiewicz Seghete, K. L., & … Craighead, W. E. (2011). Cognitive-behavioral group therapy versus group psychotherapy for social anxiety disorder among college students: A randomized controlled trial. Depression and Anxiety, 28(11), 1034-1042. doi:10.1002/da.20877 Safak, Y., Karadere, M. E., Ozdel, K., Ozcan, T., Türkçapar, M. H., Kuru, E., & Yücens, B. (2014). The effectiveness of cognitive behavioral group psychotherapy for obsessive-compulsive disorder. Turkish Journal of Psychiatry, 25(4), 225-233. Document: Group Therapy Progress Note Rubric Detail Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout. Name: NURS_6650_Week8_Discussion_Rubric Grid View List View Outstanding Performance Excellent Performance Competent Performance Proficient Performance Room for Improvement Main Posting: Response to the discusion question is reflecive with critical analysis and synthesis representive of knowledg gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources. 44 (44%) – 44 (44%) • Thoroughly responds to the discusion question(s) • Is reflecive with critical analysis and synthesis representive of knowledg gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources. • Supported by at least 3 current, credible sources 40 (40%) – 43 (43%) • Responds to the discusion question(s) • Is reflecive with critical analysis and synthesis representive of knowledg gained from the course readings for the module. • 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth • Supported by at least 3 credible references 35 (35%) – 39 (39%) • Responds to most of the discusion question(s) • Is somewhat reflecive with critical analysis and synthesis representive of knowledg gained from the course readings for the module. • 50% of post has exceptional depth and breadth • Supported by at least 3 credible references 31 (31%) – 34 (34%) • Responds to some of the discusion question(s) • One to two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addresed • Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis • Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. • Post is cited with fewer than 2 credible references 0 (0%) – 30 (30%) • Does not respond to the discusion question(s) • Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria •lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis • Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. • Contains only 1 or no credible references Main Posting: Writing 6 (6%) – 6 (6%) • Written clearly and concisely • Contains no grammatical or spelling errors • Fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style 5.5 (5.5%) – 5.5 (5.5%) • Written clearly and concisely • May contain one or no grammatical or spelling error • Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) • Written concisely • May contain one to two grammatical or spelling error • Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style 4.5 (4.5%) – 4.5 (4.5%) •Writtten somewhat concisely • May contain more than two2 spelling or grammatical errors • Contains some APA formatting erros 0 (0%) – 4 (4%) • Not written clearly or concisely • Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors • Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style Main Posting: Timely and full participation 10 (10%) – 10 (10%) • Meets requirements for timely and full participation • Posts main discussion by due date 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 6 (6%) • Does not meet requirement for full participation First Reponse Post to colleague’s main post that is reflective and justified with credible sources. 9 (9%) – 9 (9%) • Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings • Responds to questions posed by faculty • The use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives 8.5 (8.5%) – 8.5 (8.5%) • Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings 7.5 (7.5%) – 8 (8%) • Response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting 6.5 (6.5%) – 7 (7%) • Response is on topic, may have some depth 0 (0%) – 6 (6%) • Reponse may not be on topic, lacks depth First Reponse: Writing 6 (6%) – 6 (6%) • Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues • Response to faculty questions are fully answered if posed • Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources • Response is effectively written in Standard Edited English 5.5 (5.5%) – 5.5 (5.5%) • Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues • Response to faculty questions are answered if posed • Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources • Response is effectively written in Standard Edited English 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) • Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues • Response to faculty questions are mostly answered if posed • Provides opinions and ideas that are supported by few credible sources • Response is written in Standard Edited English 4.5 (4.5%) – 4.5 (4.5%) • Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication • Response to faculty questions are somewhat answered if posed • Few or no credible sources are cited 0 (0%) – 4 (4%) • Responses posted in the discussion lack effective • Response to faculty questions are missing • No credible sources are cited First Reponse: Timely and full participation 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) • Meets requirements for timely and full participation • Posts by due date 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 4 (4%) • Does not meet requirement for full participation Second Reponse: Post to colleague’s main post that is reflective and justified with credible sources. 9 (9%) – 9 (9%) • Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings • Responds to questions posed by faculty • The use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives 8.5 (8.5%) – 8.5 (8.5%) • Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings 7.5 (7.5%) – 8 (8%) • Response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting 6.5 (6.5%) – 7 (7%) • Response is on topic, may have some depth 0 (0%) – 6 (6%) • Response may not be on topic, lacks depth Second Reponse: Writing 6 (6%) – 6 (6%) • Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues • Response to faculty questions are fully answered if posed • Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources • Response is effectively written in Standard Edited English 5.5 (5.5%) – 5.5 (5.5%) • Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues • Response to faculty questions are answered if posed • Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources • Response is effectively written in Standard Edited English 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) • Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues • Response to faculty questions are mostly answered if posed • Provides opinions and ideas that are supported by few credible sources • Response is written in Standard Edited English 4.5 (4.5%) – 4.5 (4.5%) • Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication • Response to faculty questions are somewhat answered if posed • Few or no credible sources are cited 0 (0%) – 4 (4%) >• Responses posted in the discussion lack effective • Response to faculty questions are missing • No credible sources are cited Second Reponse: Timely and full participation 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) • Meets requirements for timely and full participation • Posts by due date 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) • Does not meet requirement for full participation Total Points: 100 Name: NURS_6650_Week8_Discussion_Rubric

WE’VE HAD A GOOD SUCCESS RATE ON THIS ASSIGNMENT. PLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH PapersSpot AND GET AN AMAZING DISCOUNT