Lavender Scare

my peoplesoft number is odd so must argue on behalf of reinforcing the textbook’s definition of McCarthynism**
**book content attached**
Link to Lavender Scare Attachment: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1UqBG6LIFgAWeZuO4MlO60rndry6zVrlj/view

In what way or ways does examination of this week’s primary document PDF on the Lavender Scare reinforce the textbook’s definition and presentation of McCarthyism and its ideological underpinnings? In what way or ways do the readings challenge the textbook’s definition and presentation of McCarthyism and its ideological underpinnings? If your PeopleSoft number is odd then argue on behalf of the former position, and if it is even argue on behalf of the latter position. Remember that the bulk of what you say needs to derive from the primary documents and not from the textbook.

 

Need an original paper done on this topic?
Order Here Now

 

Information taken from sources other than the primary documents will not be evaluated and posts that are structured thusly will not count. You can, though, use your knowledge of the podcasts and the textbook for framing purposes, meaning typically one sentence per paragraph to set the scene. At least 90 percent of what you say needs to come from the documents in the form of summarizing content, minimally quoting, and analyzing. If a mathematical proportion would help you consider how much to summarize, how much to quote, and how much to analyze, consider the following as a good rule of thumb: 60 percent summary and discussion, 20 percent quotation, and 20 percent analysis.

 

Need an original paper done on this topic?
Order Here Now