NURS_3100_Week_6_Assignment_1_Rubric NURS_3100_Week_6_Assignment_1_Rubric Criteria Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a learning

NURS_3100_Week_6_Assignment_1_Rubric

NURS_3100_Week_6_Assignment_1_Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeRequired ContentChoose 2 of Nursing’s Social Contract elements and discuss how they are foundational to your nursing practice.

59 to >52.0 Pts

Excellent

Student provided a fully developed explanation of how two of Nursing’s Social Contract elements are foundational to your nursing practice.

52 to >46.0 Pts

Proficient

Student provided a developed explanation of how two of Nursing’s Social Contract elements are foundational to your nursing practice.

46 to >40.0 Pts

Basic

Student provided a minimally developed explanation of how two of Nursing’s Social Contract elements are foundational to your nursing practice.

40 to >0 Pts

Needs Improvement

Student provided an under-developed explanation of how two of Nursing’s Social Contract elements are foundational to your nursing practice.

59 pts

This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeHow do you intend to make a difference by confronting a current challenge in health care where you live, in your profession, or on a global scale?

60 to >53.0 Pts

Excellent

Student provided a fully developed description of how you intend to make a difference by confronting a current challenge in health care where you live, in your profession, or on a global scale.

53 to >47.0 Pts

Proficient

Student provided a developed description of how you intend to make a difference by confronting a current challenge in health care where you live, in your profession, or on a global scale.

47 to >41.0 Pts

Basic

Student provided a minimally developed description of how you intend to make a difference by confronting a current challenge in health care where you live, in your profession, or on a global scale.

41 to >0 Pts

Needs Improvement

Student provided an under-developed description of how you intend to make a difference by confronting a current challenge in health care where you live, in your profession, or on a global scale.

60 pts

This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeProfessional Writing: Clarity, Flow, and Organization

17 to >15.0 Pts

Excellent

Content is free from spelling, punctuation, and grammar/syntax errors. Writing demonstrates very well-formed sentence and paragraph structure. Content presented is completely clear, logical, and well-organized.

15 to >13.0 Pts

Proficient

Content contains minor spelling, punctuation, and/or grammar/syntax errors. Writing demonstrates appropriate sentence and paragraph structure. Content presented is mostly clear, logical, and well-organized.

13 to >11.0 Pts

Basic

Content contains moderate spelling, punctuation, and/or grammar/syntax errors. Writing demonstrates adequate sentence and paragraph structure and may require some editing. Content presented is adequately clear, logical, and/or organized, but could benefit from additional editing/revision.

11 to >0 Pts

Needs Improvement

Content contains significant spelling, punctuation, and/or grammar/syntax errors. Writing does not demonstrate adequate sentence and paragraph structure and requires additional editing/proofreading. Key sections of presented content lack clarity, logical flow, and/or organization.

17 pts

This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeProfessional Writing: Context, Audience, Purpose, and Tone

17 to >15.0 Pts

Excellent

Content clearly demonstrates awareness of context, audience, and purpose. Tone is highly professional, scholarly, and free from bias, and style is appropriate for the professional setting/workplace context.

15 to >13.0 Pts

Proficient

Content demonstrates satisfactory awareness of context, audience, and purpose. Tone is adequately professional, scholarly, and/or free from bias, and style is consistent with the professional setting/workplace context.

13 to >11.0 Pts

Basic

Content demonstrates basic awareness of context, audience, and purpose. Tone is somewhat professional, scholarly, and/or free from bias, and style is mostly consistent with the professional setting/workplace context.

11 to >0 Pts

Needs Improvement

Content minimally or does not demonstrate awareness of context, audience, and/or purpose. Writing is not reflective of professional/scholarly tone and/or is not free of bias. Style is inconsistent with the professional setting/workplace context and reflects the need for additional editing.

17 pts

This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeProfessional Writing: Originality, Source Credibility, and Attribution of Ideas

17 to >15.0 Pts

Excellent

Content reflects original thought and writing and proper paraphrasing. Writing demonstrates full adherence to reference requirements, including the use of credible evidence to support a claim, with appropriate source attribution (when applicable) and references.

15 to >13.0 Pts

Proficient

Content adequately reflects original writing and paraphrasing. Writing demonstrates adequate adherence to reference requirements, including the use of credible evidence to support a claim, with appropriate source attribution (when applicable) and references. There are one or two minor errors.

13 to >11.0 Pts

Basic

Content somewhat reflects original writing and paraphrasing. Writing somewhat demonstrates adherence to reference requirements, including the use of credible evidence to support a claim, with appropriate source attribution (when applicable) and references. There are two or three minor errors.

11 to >0 Pts

Needs Improvement

Content does not adequately reflect original writing and/or paraphrasing. Writing demonstrates inconsistent adherence to reference requirements, including the use of credible evidence to support a claim, with appropriate source attribution (when applicable) and reference. There are numerous and/or significant errors.

17 pts

Total points: 170