Research Topic Name: 1 pt. Date: 1 pt. Paper Topic: Mt. Vesuvius’

Research Topic

Name:

1 pt.

Date:

1 pt.

Paper Topic:

Mt. Vesuvius’ Destruction of Pompeii and Herculaneum

1 pt.

Submit your research paper topic with a 250-word research plan with a provisional bibliography.

Type your 250-word research plan into the box below.

39 pts.

The 79 AD Mount Vesuvius eruption is considered a disaster. The eruption is well known for its devastation of Pompeii and Herculaneum. This research will examine how the eruption affected these Roman cities’ social, cultural, and economic characteristics. To reach the research goals, the study will begin with an assessment of the event’s historical context and range of eruption-related ideas. This will ensure the research achieves its goals. Many historical sources will be used in the inquiry. These sources will explain the eruption’s causes and effects. JSTOR and Project Muse are two reputable academic resources used to obtain these intellectual papers. Additionally, the research will examine academic sources that assess the eruption-affected population’s daily, socioeconomic, and cultural habits.

To develop a deeper understanding of the personal experiences of particular individuals or communities that were significantly affected by the eruption, the research will involve the assessment of some primary sources. The sources will be critically analyzed to assess the different perspectives that existed concerning the causes of the eruption, its immediate impacts, and its long-term implication on the Roman Society. The research plan will conclude with the synthesis of findings, which will provide a further breakdown of how the eruption of Mount Vesuvius reshaped the socio-cultural aspects of Pompeii and Herculaneum while highlighting its diverse implications on the contemporary world. The research will put more focus on assessing academic sources to elaborate on how the eruption has been shaping the comprehension of the ancient world and how natural disasters impacted it.

Write in the word count of your research plan above.

252 words

1 pt.

supply seven (7) sources (five [5[ academic secondary sources + two [2] primary sources) in the tables below

use the TURABIAN citation style

use only the UHD LIBRARY databases; specify the database used for each source

7 pts.

five (5) academic secondary sources (.5 / citation)

the database used (.5 / database)

Doronzo, Domenico M., Mauro A. Di Vito, Ilenia Arienzo, Monica Bini, Benedetta Calusi, Matteo Cerminara, Stefano Corradini, et al. “The 79 CE Eruption of Vesuvius: A Lesson from the Past and the Need of a Multidisciplinary Approach for Developments in Volcanology.” Earth-science reviews 231 (2022): 104072-. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2022.104072

ScienceDirect

Tutino, Stefania. “The Mystery of Mount Vesuvius’s Crosses: Belief, Credulity, and Credibility in Post-Reformation Catholicism.” Journal of the history of ideas 83, no. 2 (2022): 207–227. https://doi.org/10.1353/jhi.2022.0010

Project Muse

Levin, Yael. “Conrad, Freud, and Derrida on Pompeii: A Paradigm of Disappearance.” Partial answers 3, no. 1 (2005): 81–99. https://doi.org/10.1353/pan.0.0121

Project Muse

Scandone, Roberto. “Saving Vesuvius from Pompeii.” Nature (London) 571, no. 7764 (2019): 174–174.

ProQuest

ZUCCARO, G, F CACACE, R. J. S SPENCE, and P. J BAXTER. “Impact of Explosive Eruption Scenarios at Vesuvius: Evaluating Explosive Eruption Risk at European Volcanoes.” Journal of volcanology and geothermal research 178, no. 3 (2008): 416–453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2008.01.005

ScienceDirect

two (2) primary sources

Jones, Nicholas F. “Pliny the Younger’s Vesuvius ‘Letters’ (6.16 and 6.20).” The Classical world 95, no. 1 (2001): 31–48. https://doi.org/10.2307/4352621

JSTOR

Mierow, Charles Christopher. “Vesuvius in Eruption: The Account of an Eye-Witness.” The Sewanee review 39, no. 3 (1931): 343–350. https://www.jstor.org/stable/27534661

JSTOR