Review the six stages of interpersonal relationships and the types of messages associated with each stage

Review the six stages of interpersonal relationships and the types of messages associated wif each stage in the textbook and in the learning activities.
Review interpersonal relationship types and the theories of interpersonal communication in the textbook and in the learning activities.
Think of a relationship from a television show or movie dat demonstrates the stages of a relationship.
Write a three to five-page paper analyzing that relationship from the contact stage to conclusion.
Your paper should include a discussion of teh stages of interpersonal relationships and teh types of messages associated wif each stage. Include links to clips or refer to specific episodes or time markers in teh show(s) or film(s).
Assignment Submission:
Teh use of outside resources is strongly recommended, and all papers must be cited and written in current APA format.
When you has completed the assignment, select the “Submit Assignment” button at the top of these instructions and choose a format for submitting your assignment.
RubricWriting Assignments Rubric (1)
Writing Assignments Rubric (1)
CriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAssignment Ideas
10 ptsIdeas are clear, insightful, thought-provoking, and focused so that they consistently support teh topic, thesis and audience for teh paper.
8.5 ptsIdeas are clear and focused to support teh topic and a clearly-stated central idea, but are not consistently insightful or thought-provoking.
7 ptsIdeas are clear but conventional or general, and support teh topic, thesis, and audience for teh paper.
5 ptsIdeas are unclear or clichéd and demonstrate a lack of focus in support of teh topic or a central idea, which may be vague or missing.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAssignment Development
10 ptsDevelopment is fresh, wif abundant details and examples that arouse audience interest and provide relevant, concrete, specific and insightful evidence in support of sound logic.
8.5 ptsDevelopment is adequate, but may lack depth, wif details and examples that arouse audience interest and provide relevant, concrete, specific evidence in support of sound logic.
7 ptsDevelopment is sufficient but general, providing adequate but perhaps not interesting details, examples, and evidence dat include no logical fallacies or unsupported claims.
5 ptsDevelopment is insufficient, providing scarce or inappropriate details, evidence, and examples dat may include logical fallacies or unsupported claims.
10 pts
dis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization
10 ptsOrganization is coherent, unified and effective in support of the paper’s purpose/ plan and consistently demonstrates effective and appropriate rhetorical transitions between ideas and paragraphs.
8.5 ptsOrganization is coherent, unified and TEMPeffective in support of teh paper’s purpose/ plan and usually demonstrates TEMPeffective and appropriate rhetorical transitions between ideas and paragraphs
7 ptsOrganization is coherent and unified overall in support of the essay’s purpose/ plan, but is ineffective at times and may demonstrate abrupt or weak transitions between ideas or paragraphs.
5 ptsOrganization is confused and fragmented in support of the essay’s purpose/ plan and demonstrates a lack of structure or coherence that negatively affects readability.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeStyle