Running Head: CORPORATE FINANCE 2 Running Head: CORPORATE FINANCE 1 Corporate Finance

Running Head: CORPORATE FINANCE 2

Running Head: CORPORATE FINANCE 1

Corporate Finance

Assignment 5

Part – 1

EFFICIENT CAPITAL MARKETS AND CAPITAL STRUCTURE

The CEO of Angelina Corporation, Sara Brown is meeting with the company’s board of directors to discuss efficient capital markets and behavioral challenges and their impact on the company’s stock. She explains that if capital markets are efficient, management cannot create value by fooling investors, and market value of stock reflects underlying intrinsic value. She added that stock prices reflect available information. Investors are rational and will analyze the available information and adjust their estimates of stock price in a rational way. Sara gave the following statements about the efficient market hypothesis:

Statement 1: Because information is reflected in prices immediately, investors should expect to obtain a normal rate of return. Information reflects so quickly in stock prices that no investor can gain competitive advantage over other investors.

Statement 2: Stock prices reflect underlying value.

Statement 3: Prices of stocks will only change if new information becomes available.

Statement 4: Managers cannot boost stock prices through creative accounting.

Statement 5: All shares of stock have the same expected returns.

A board member, David Goldreich has drawn Sara’s attention to three forms of market efficiency namely weak-form efficiency, semi-strong efficiency, and strong-form efficiency. Mr. Goldreich explains that under each form, different types of information are assumed to reflect in stock prices.

Another board member, Michael Burton, says that new research studies are emerging in behavioral finance that question the rationality of investors. Mr. Burton explains that investors do not act rationally all the time in the investment decision making process so the market cannot be efficient. The results of the studies indicate that investors are prone to heuristics-driven biases such as overconfidence, decision regret, familiarity, conservatism, representativeness, and confirmation bias. The meeting was postponed to next week when the board will meet to finish the discussion on the efficient markets and consider the capital structure of Angelina corporation.

The board chairman wants you to address the following questions before the next meeting.

1.  Determine whether the following statements by Sara Brown about efficient market hypothesis are correct or incorrect:

            a.   Statement 1

            b.   Statement 2

            c.   Statement 3

            d.   Statement 4

            e.   Statement 5

2.  What different types of information are assumed to reflect in the company’s stock price? Explain the different types of information under each form of market efficiency as stated by Mr. Goldreich.

3.  An individual investor, Ms. Brenda Biswa wants to invest in Angelina corporation. She has gathered data on the company from the current issue of the company’s annual financial report, newspapers, and press release of the capital investment project. Assuming the market is semi-strong efficient, can Ms. Biswa earn above-average returns using this material public information? Explain.

4.  Ms. Brenda Biswa is consulting with her financial advisor, Paul Marsh. Paul believes that new information does not quickly get to all investors and that it takes time to analyze and act on new information. He tells Ms. Biswa that investors are not rational, deviations from rationality are similar across investors, and arbitrage, although costly, cannot eliminate inefficiencies. Does Paul Marsh believe in market efficiency? Explain why.

5. Explain how behavioral biases of overconfidence, regret, representativeness, and familiarity can affect investment behavior of investors of Angelina Corporation.

6. The board is meeting to discuss its capital structure. Explain the basic goal of financial management with regard to capital structure to the board of Angelina Corporation.

7. Angelina Corporation wants to determine the optimal capital structure that will maximize the value of the company by restructuring its finances. The original capital structure has no debt with a firm value of $1,000,000 (in millions) and the four possibilities under the new capital structure are presented below:

 

No debt

Proposed

Proposed

Proposed

Proposed

 

(Original structure $000)

restructuring 1

restructuring 2

restructuring 3

restructuring 4

Debt

0

         500,000

             400,000

            300,000

               200,000

Equity

1,000,000

         650,000

             850,000

            800,000

               830,000

Firm value

                 1,000,000

      1,150,000

          1,250,000

         1,100,000

            1,030,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

Percentage of debt

0

43.48

32.00

27.27

19.42

Percentage of equity

100

56.52

68.00

72.73

80.58

 

 

 

 

 

 

Return to shareholders after restructuring

4.80%

10.10%

13.60%

6.10%

5.12%

Weighted average cost of capital (WACC)

15.80

9.50

9.30

10.20

14.50

 

Base only on the information in the table, should Angelina Corporation restructure the firm? Explain. If yes, which proposed capital structure do you recommend for Angelina Corporation and why?

Part -2

CAPITAL STRUCTURE AND DIVIDEND PAYOUTS

The board of directors of Angelina Corporation met today to discuss the capital structure and dividend policy of the company. The board discussed the capital structure of 60 percent debt and 40 percent equity. During the meeting it came up that debt provides tax benefits to the firm because interest is tax deductible whereas dividend is not. But the debt ratio of 60 percent was not supported by some board members. One board member, Robert Smith wanted the capital structure to be 40% debt and 60% equity because he believes that a high debt ratio increases the financial risk of the business. Jeff Warren, the CFO of the company, stressed in his presentation to the board that debt can put pressure on the firm because interests and principal payments are fixed obligations that the company must pay, no matter the profit of the company. He stated that if these obligations are not met, the company may risk some sort of financial distress and files for bankruptcy. Jeff continued to explain that if the company files for bankruptcy there are direct and indirect costs as well as agency costs that the company must incur.

Alexis Bailey, another board member suggested that there are ways to reduce the cost of debt by hiring an expert to handle the company’s debt agreements between the shareholders and bondholders. She stated that protective covenants are incorporated as part of the loan agreement and must be taken seriously because a broken covenant can lead to default. She believed that costs of debt can be reduced with negative covenants (also called restrictive covenants) and positive covenants. John Miller, the Investor Relations Officer stated that one reason bankruptcy costs are so high is that different creditors and their lawyers contend with each other. He suggested that if debt can be consolidated, or if bondholders can be allowed to purchase stock of the company bankruptcy cost will be reduced. In this way, stockholders and debtholders are not pitted against each other because they are not separate entities. He cited examples in Japan where large banks generally take significant stock positions in the firms to which they lend money.

The employee representative on the board, Ms. Johnson used the agency costs to explain that when a firm has debt, conflicts of interest arise between stockholders and bondholders. Because of this, stockholders are tempted to pursue selfish strategies. These strategies are costly because they will lower the market value of the firm. Philip Suzuki, director of Marketing and a board member was of the view that determining optimal debt-equity ratio is not an easy task and varies across industries so the company should follow the rules of the pecking-order theory when financing capital projects. No agreement was reached on the company’s capital structure, but the CEO and Jeff believed that the 32-68 debt-equity ratio discussed in the previous week will minimize the cost of capital and improve the value of the firm.

The board is retaining you as the financial consultant to assist with the company’s capital structure and dividend payout decisions. The Chairman of the board wants you to address the following questions:

 List three advantages and two disadvantages of the 60% debt ratio proposed by some of the board members.

 State two examples each of direct costs, indirect costs and agency costs associated with financial distress that Jeff stated in his presentation to the board.

Explain the following cost reduction techniques suggested by Alexis and John Miller.

positive covenant

negative covenant

debt consolidation

Explain the rules of pecking-order theory of capital structure as suggested to the board members by Mr. Suzuki, the director of Marketing. List three implications of the pecking-order theory.

Angelina Corporation is planning to pay dividends to shareholders next year. Suggest three types of dividends that the board can consider.

Instead of paying dividends, the firm may use the cash to repurchase shares of its own stock. Why should Angelina Corporation choose to repurchase its own stock over payment of dividends?

Angelina Corporation has sufficient cash of $500 million and is considering other alternatives to dividend payment mainly because of unfavorable tax treatment of dividends. Explain four alternatives to a dividend payment to the board.

Amber Bista owns 50,000 shares of Angelina Corporation. He anticipates a decline in the stock price because of the sudden death of the CEO, and a rise in inflation. But because of rising economic growth and favorable GDP figures, he is not certain of the direction of the company’s stock. He wants to use options to hedge his investment risk. Unfortunately, he does not understand options.

i. Explain a call option and a put option to Amber.

ii. Explain the circumstances under which Amber will want to buy each of the options.