STATISTIC IN MEDIA PROJECT

g. vertical scale is not given in frequencies or proportions)0 ptsBar plot is missing or only a link is given3 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome(b)1 ptsCorrect categorical categorical variable is identified0 ptsVariable identified is incorrect or missing1 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome(c-1)2 ptsMost common and least common categories are given correctly1 ptsEither most common or least common category is given correctly0 ptsMost common and least common categories are both incorrect or missing2 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome(c-2)2 ptsp-hat is correct, with work shown1 ptsp-hat is correct, but no work is shown0 ptsp-hat is incorrect or missing2 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome(c-3)2 ptsConjecture is correct, with work shown1 ptsConjecture is correct, but no work is shown0 ptsConjecture is incorrect or missing2 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome(d)2 ptsAnswer about anything misleading is correct and well-supported1 ptsAnswer about anything misleading is given, but is not well-supported0 ptsMissing or completely incorrect2 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome(d)2 ptsWell-thought out suggestion for improvement is given1 ptsSuggestion for improvement is given, but is not well-thought out0 ptsMissing or completely incorrect2 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome(e)3 ptsDetailed sampling method is identified or suggested correctly, including the name of the method2 ptsDescription is correct, but sampling method given is incorrect1 ptsDescription is incorrect or not detailed enough0 ptsMissing or completely incorrect3 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome(e)2 ptsSimulation dotplot is uploaded (not an attachment) and shows appropriate results of 50 trials using n=100 and p=0.51 ptsSimulation dotplot is uploaded (not attached) but not all inputs were done correctly0 ptsDotplot is attached, missing, or completely incorrect2 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome(e)2 pts2-sided p-value is computed correctly1 ptscorrect 1-sided p-value is given0 ptsMissing or completely incorrect2 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome(e)2 ptsCorrect decision about null hypothesis is given1 ptsconclusion about null hypothesis matches p-value given, but is incorrect0 ptsMissing or completely incorrect2 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome(e)2 ptsCorrect conclusion is given in context1 ptsCorrect conclusion is given, but not in context0 ptsMissing or completely incorrect2 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOn-time, in correct format5 ptsFull MarksProject is submitted by the due date, and is formatted correctly as a single pdf document, with graphics embedded0 ptsProject is submitted on time, but the formatting is incorrect.0 ptsProject not submitted on time, formatting is also incorrect.0 ptsProject was not submitted on time. Formatting is correct.5 ptsTotal Points: 30Part II: Statistics in the Media ProjectCriteria    Ratings    PtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome(a)2 ptsCorrect description of p in context1 ptsMinor error in description of p0 ptsMissing or incorrect2 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome(b)3 ptsAll conditions are listed and checked correctly2 pts2 conditions are listed and checked correctly, 1 condition is missing/incorrect/not checked correctly1 pts1 condition is listed and checked correctly, 2 conditions are missing/incorrect/not checked correctly OR conditions are listed correctly but not checked0 ptsMissing or completely incorrect3 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome(b)2 ptsConclusion about whether results will be valid is correct and well-supported1 ptsConclusion is incorrect but well-supported or correct but only partially supported0 ptsMissing or completely incorrect2 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome(c)3 ptsConfidence Interval is correct, with work/technology inputs included2 ptsConfidence Interval is incorrect, but supporting work is correct1 ptsConfidence Interval is correct but supporting work is missing/incorrect0 ptsMissing or completely incorrect3 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome(c)2 ptsConfidence Interval interpretation is correct and in context1 ptsConfidence interval has a minor error or is not in context0 ptsMissing or has major errors2 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome(d)1 ptsNew np and n(1-p) check is shown and calculated correctly0 ptsMissing or incorrect1 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome(d)1 ptsConclusion about whether results will be valid is correct and well-supported0 ptsMissing, unsupported, or incorrect1 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome(e)6 ptsHypothesis steps are complete and correct5 pts-1 for each missing/incorrect piece: hypotheses, test statistic, p-value, decision about the null hypothesis, conclusion in context0 ptsMissing6 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome(f)2 ptsSimulation results from Part I are included0 ptsMissing2 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome(f)3 ptsComparison is correct and Discussion of similarities/differences and validity is well-supported2 ptsComparison/Discussion are correct but incomplete/partially supported1 ptsComparison or Discussion is missing or has errors0 ptsComparison and Discussion are both missing or completely incorrect3 ptsTotal Points: 25