This type of report also includes a summary of the services provided to these groups or individuals. This evaluation is

This type of report also includes a summary of the services provided to these groups or individuals. This evaluation is used by the various entities to assess basic needs, competencies, preferences, skills, traits, dispositions, and abilities for different individuals in a variety of settings.Psychological reports vary widely depending on the psychology professional creating it and the needs being assessed. Some of the psychology professionals who create this type of report include counselors, school psychologists, consultants, psychometricians, or psychological examiners. This type of report may be as short as three pages or as long as 20 or more pages depending on the needs of the stakeholders. Many reports include tables of scores that are attached either in an appendix or integrated into the report. Despite the many variations in assessment reports, most include the same essential information and headings.. Once the scenario has been chosen, research a minimum of four peer-reviewed articles that relate to and support the content of the scenario and the report as outlined below. The following headings and content must be included in the report: =The Reason for Referral and Background InformationIn this section, describe the reasons for the referral and relevant background information for all stakeholders from the chosen personality assessment scenario.=Assessment ProceduresIn this section, include a bulleted list of the test(s) and other assessment measures recommended for the evaluation of the given scenario. In addition to the assessment(s) initially provided in the personality assessment scenario, include at least three other measures appropriate for the scenario.Immediately following the bulleted list, include a narrative description of the assessments. In the narrative, examine and comment on the major theoretical approaches, research methods, and assessment instruments appropriate for the situation and stakeholder needs. In order to defend the choice of recommended assessments, evaluate current research in the field of personality theories and provide examples of how these assessments are valid for use in the chosen scenario. For additional support of these recommended assessment measures,  evaluate the standardization, reliability and validity, and cultural considerations present in these personality assessments that make them the most appropriate tools for the given scenario. Conclude the narrative by assessing types of personality measurements and research designs often used in scenarios like the one chosen and providing a rationale for why some of those assessments were not included.=General Observations and ImpressionsIn this section, describe general observations of the client during the assessment period provided in the chosen personality assessment scenario and explain whether the client’s behavior might have had a negative impact on the test results. Analyze and comment on how the APA’s Ethical Principles and Code of Conduct affected the implementation of the personality assessment during the initial process. Based on the observations and analysis, assess the validity of the evaluation and make a recommendation for or against the necessity for additional testing.=Test Results and InterpretationsIn this section, analyze the results of the assessment provided in the chosen personality assessment scenario. Based on the score,  interpret the personality factors (conscientiousness, openness, emotional stability, introversion, extroversion, work drive, self-directedness, etc.) that are present.=Summary and RecommendationsIn this section, summarize the test results.  They will provide a complete explanation for the evaluation, the procedures and measures used, and the results and include any recommendations translating the evaluation into strategies and suggestions to support the client. Finally, provide any conclusions and diagnostic impressions drawn from the previous sections of the report.Must include the required headings and content as listed above.Must address the topic of the paper with critical thought.Must utilize assessment manuals as necessary to support the inclusion and results of the assessments.Must use a minimum of four peer-reviewed sources, =================================================https://www.apa.org/ethics/code/index