Uncategorized

21 Assignment One: Overview of the Organization by ORGL 8750- CRN 50738

Posted by

admin

On August 4, 2024

Comments Off

Assignment One: Overview of the Organization

ORGL 8750- CRN 50738

Strategic Planning

Nova Southeastern University

June 23, 2024

Assignment One: Overview of the Organization

Organization Introduction

A key participant in the criminal justice system in South Florida, the Miami-Dade County Corrections and Rehabilitation Department (MDCR) is primarily responsible for the administration of care, custody, and control of inmates within Miami-Dade County (Miami-Dade County, 2023). Low reoffending rates and effective reintegration into society are the goals of the medium-to-high-intensity programs offered in these institutions, which also hold classified offenders and provide limited jail services (Miami-Dade County, 2023).

MDCR can serve as an example among its industry members by broadening the use of innovative rehabilitation practices and up-to-date correctional technologies. Studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of comprehensive offender rehabilitation programs in lowering recidivism and enhancing public safety (Latessa & Lovins, 2019). These programs include education, career training, mental health care, and treatment for drug use disorders (Latessa & Lovins, 2019). In this way, the facility can become a model for other correctional centers by integrating research-based practices and improving the MDCR’s rehabilitation processes.

If I were provided with the authority and decision-making power in MDCR, there is one primary change I would consider implementing measures to combat overcrowding. High densities are lethal to inmates and employees and contribute to the low effectiveness of correctional measures (Dey Ravena, 2019). Such changes as probation, community service, house arrest, and other diversionary measures could help reduce congestion and channel efforts towards violent criminals rather than novice offenders who could benefit from community rehabilitation services (Link & Reece, 2021)

However, MDCR has a strategic plan that addresses its goals and objectives, which include inmate management and rehabilitation, prison and physical security, and other related activities. Therefore, this strategic plan serves as a guide to the functioning of this department and its activities to fulfill the mission and vision (Carter et al., 2021). It is essential to consider these components and make recommendations to ensure that MDCR continues to fulfill its mission and achieve its objectives (Carter et al., 2021).

Organization Background and History

As a reflection of the changing nature of the criminal justice systems throughout the nation, the Miami-Dade County Corrections and Rehabilitation Department’s history might be described as complex (Harris, 2021). MDCR was established at the beginning of the 1900s; initially the department consisted of one jail facility meant to confine a few inmates temporarily. As the population of Miami-Dade County grew and the demands on the criminal justice system increased, the department saw significant improvements in its infrastructure and the establishment of services (Rundle & Talpins, 2020).

During the middle twentieth century, MDCR expanded its population and employed modern security protocols for the growing number of inmates housed (Harris, 2024). Turner Guilford Knight Correctional Center is now a sprawling complex that began construction in the 1970s, including more complex correctional procedures and buildings to accommodate an increased population of inmates (Miami-Dade County, 2023).

MDCR’s progress has also advanced to the twenty-first century, with a focus on rehabilitation and parole activities (Harris, 2021). Being aware that recidivism rates should be low, MDCR implemented several educational, vocational, and therapeutic programs to prepare inmates to become law-abiding citizens again. According to many studies, rehabilitative programs work, and recidivism rates can be significantly lowered (Miller et al., 2019).

In recent years, MDCR has also sought to adopt technology for operations and inmates. Some of the technological measures adopted by the department include electronic monitoring and tracking of the inmates, among others; these have made correctional practices in the department efficient and effective (Miller et al., 2019). These are some of the measures being taken to improve the correctional system to the current standards of security and effectiveness as well as the welfare of the inmates (Mbatha et al., 2020).

It is also crucial to note that MDCR has continued its attempts to overcome some of these challenges, such as the overcrowding of inmates and the distribution of resources. The department is also interested in finding research-based solutions and best practices to improve its functions and the benefits to society (Miami-Dade County, 2023). Therefore, by balancing punitive and reformative strategies, MDCR seeks to achieve its mission of providing sufficient and secure correctional facilities that are safe and humane to supporting offenders transform their lives and reduce the risk of reoffending (Miami-Dade County, 2023).

Organization Vision, Mission, and Value Statements

Organizational Vision Statement

According to Fitzsimmons et al. (2022), a vision statement is a future-oriented declaration of a business entity’s objectives and missions. It has the function of a map that assists in determining objectives and choosing the appropriate direction (Fitzsimmons et al., 2022). The current vision statement of MDCR is in line with its desire to be perceived as the leading correction and rehabilitation facility. This vision also encompasses safety, security, and inmate rehabilitation, one of the organization’s strategic objectives (Fitzsimmons et al., 2022). If I had a chance to change the vision statement, it would be: “Our mission is to help our clients (inmates) become a part of the community and improve the corrective processes. A good vision must, therefore, not only inspire internal stakeholders but also make external stakeholders, such as the community and other partner in the criminal justice system, feel at ease about the organization” (Fitzsimmons et al., 2022). Research has indicated that the vision statements oriented toward the community and the environment are received with a better perception by the public (Kantabutra, 2020). I propose revising the identified vision to include these aspects while still being relevant and practical.

Organizational Mission Statement

A mission statement defines the sphere of interest of the organization and its objectives (Fitzsimmons et al., 2022). The current MDCR mission statement revolves around providing inmate programs to guarantee that inmates are held safely, securely, and humanely. This mission clearly explains the two-fold goal of rehabilitating the inmates while serving the public interest. Ideally, a mission statement should be brief and precise, giving direction on how operations and strategies should be carried out (Kantabutra, 2020). I would change the mission statement to include commitments to innovation and collaboration. Emphasizing a commitment to deliver new technologies and methods to help shift the attention to improvement (Papadimitriou & Schiffecker, 2023). Incorporating references to working with community organizations and other partners may enhance the mission statement, as partnership in corrections has significant benefits for inmates and communities (Allison, 2019). These alterations would ensure that the mission statement encompasses MDCR tactical strategies in a much more comprehensive way.

Organizational Value Statement

A value statement is a formal declaration of the principles that govern the culture and functionality of an organization (Mittelstadt, 2019). The present value statement at MDCR includes integrity, accountability, respect, and professionalism. These values help to foster proper organizational culture and corporate governance. The value statements are an indispensable component of the organizational environment and influence stakeholders’ perceptions. If I modify the value statement, I would incorporate other values like innovation, transparency, and community inclusion. The word including implies that the new practices and technologies will be incorporated into the agency management. This increase the interested in collaborating with the community to attain specific goals (Allison, 2019). There is evidence that value statements illustrating these principles will enhance organizational performance and stakeholders’ trust (Fitzsimmons et al., 2022). In this way, it will be possible to improve the organizational culture and the perception of the agency by the general public.

Organizational Reputation

Reputation defines an organization’s ability to employ and retain human resources, mobilize resources, and gain the public’s and other stakeholders’ confidence (Ravasi et al.,2018). While a positive reputation enhances an organization’s image and operations, a negative reputation undermines stakeholders’ confidence and the organization. According to Bankins & Waterhouse (2019), reputation is a function of behavior, communication, and the degree of obligation to adhere to stakeholders’ expectations.

MDCR has distinctive operational methods, inmate management, and community relationship concerns. This reputation speaks volumes about the department’s human resources regarding staff professionalism and expertise (Bankins & Waterhouse, 2019) MDCR employs staff from a diverse group trained in various aspects of corrections and rehabilitations, thus making the department a better place to provide order and safety in its facilities. However, staff misconduct and questions of staff motivation have been found at one point to drag the department down (Novisky et al., 2022).

Another aspect of the tangible resources that have contributed to the building of the reputation of MDCR includes the state and management of infrastructures. For example, issues such as the well-being and security of inmates have been raised because of congestion in detention facilities (Latessa & Lovins, 2019). Issues about overcrowding and the impact on those incarerated health and rehabilitation have sometimes raised public interest (Allen, 2019). Attempts to modernize the infrastructure and introduce new technologies have been encouraged, proving that the department wants to improve the conditions and practices (Smith, 2021).

The stakeholders’ satisfaction is the other factor contributing to MDCR’s reputation. The organizational internal environment encompasses employee and staff satisfaction that arises from working conditions, professional development, and organizational support (Bankins & Waterhouse, 2019). A study by Ravasi et al. (2018) states that transparency and stakeholder engagement are vital in building and protecting organizational reputation. Some of the improvements that have been observed include MDCR’s move towards improving organizational community communication and involving stakeholders in decision-making processes. However, more could be done concerning dissatisfaction and stakeholder management.

Organizational Sustainability

Organizational Sustainability is a crucial factor in the long run of an institution’s survival. Sustainability management can be associated with several activities and initiatives to maintain fundamental economic, organizational, ecological, and social values (Dzhengiz, 2020). It is clear that organizations are better positioned to act on new opportunities and threats to mitigate or seize them. Sustainability includes the economic and social systems that would enable the success of the agency and the impact on its stakeholders (Lăzăroiu, 2020).

MDCR is an institution dedicated to strategic, developmental goals and sustainable practices in its operations. Therefore, rational use and searching for additional financing, such as grants and partner cooperation, allow for operational efficiency (Lăzăroiu, 2020). MDCR has environmental processes that include efficient lighting, water saving, and waste disposal. The above changes are similar to other worldwide changes that enhance environmental concern and sustainability in public administration (Cullen et al., 2017).

The strengths of MDCR include offering comprehensive rehabilitation programs that are equipped with the nessceary skills that are present to help reduce inmate recidivism (Cullen et al., 2017). Nonetheless, challenges such as congestion of facilities and high operation costs are among the concerns that, if poorly managed, can compromise sustainable development (Morgan et al., 2019). Externally, they include technology that may improve operations, sustainability, and better funding through policies. Threats include legal cases and criticism, which can be prevented by practicing openness and engaging with the community effectively (Cullen et al., 2017).

The internal and external analysis would help MDCR understand how to develop and sustain its vision as a leading corrections and rehabilitation institution. Continuous assessment and alteration of the sustainability programs will be crucial in addressing the many events that may arise regarding the organization’s ability to contribute to society’s welfare.

SWOT Analysis

SWOT analysis is used in strategic management for the identification of the opportunities and threats that are likely to be faced by an organization. It empowers organizations to locate themselves concerning competition to discover how strengths can be leveraged, weaknesses corrected, opportunities maximized, and threats minimized (Boitrelle et al., 2021).

The department provides education, employment, and psychiatric treatment, all essential to help prevent offenders from returning to jail/ prison and reintegrating into society (Morgan et al., 2019). MDCR has well-trained human resource capable of addressing the many aspects of correction and rehabilitation, increasing efficiency and credibility such as counsleors and contracted doctors. Other technological improvements include electronic monitoring systems and automated inmate tracking, which increase organizational efficiency and protection (Smith, 2021). MDCR continues to foster working relations with different agencies to assist inmates and their families and ensure they get community support (Cullen et al., 2017). The department’s compliance with legal and ethical standards also fosters public confidence (Cullen et al., 2017).

MDCR has internal threats that should be addressed to avoid compromising the agency’s success. High population density compromises the safety of inmates as well as the functionality of rehabilitation procedures (Morgan et al., 2019). One of the significant barriers to operation is the high cost of operating correctional facilities, which includes the cost of constructing, maintaining, and running the facilities. Circumstances where staff members engage in misconduct can reduce public trust and negatively affect the department (Allen, 2019). Lack of adequate funds to support new programs and technologies is a significant challenge as it prevents implementing programs and technology that can improve the inmates’ productivity and well-being. Furthermore, there are current issues regarding inmate reentry programs, implying high recidivism rates even after rehabilitation (Cullen et al., 2017).

Externally, there are various opportunities through which MDCR can improve its operations. The involvement of educational institutions and vocational rehabilitation centers can help to expand rehabilitation activities, which will have a positive impact (Smith, 2021). More funding through grants and partnerships with federal or state agencies can help to establish new programs (Cullen et al., 2017). Working with other local agencies, non-governmental organizations, and stakeholders can enhance inmate service and provision. There are always chances to enhance security, effectiveness, and positive outcomes in rehabilitation through technology improvements (Smith, 2021). Policy reforms that may help improve corrections can establish conditions that can help implement new practices and innovations (Morgan et al., 2019).

There are also numerous external threats that MDCR has to face and deal with effectively. Legal risks and litigation can reduce the department’s funds and tarnish its reputation. Negative media coverage implies a loss of community and stakeholder trust (Cullen et al., 2017). Changes in legislation regarding funding from federal and state levels present a financial threat (Morgan et al., 2019). There are constant risks of security breaches and incidents within facilities that endanger the inmates and the staff (Smith, 2021). Emergency health events, including pandemics, pose a high threat to inmates and staff’s health and interfere with the functions of the facility.

Table 1

List of Strength, Weakness, Opportunity, and Threat Factors

Strengths

Comprehensive Rehabilitation Programs

Skilled Workforce

Strong Community Partnerships

Technological Advancements

Commitment to Transparency

Weaknesses

Overcrowded Facilities

Staff Misconduct

High Operational Costs

Limited Funding for New Initiatives

Challenges in Inmate Re-entry Programs

Opportunities

Expansion of Rehabilitation Programs

Collaboration with External Organizations

Increased Funding Through Grants

Policy Reforms Supporting Corrections Improvement

Technological Advancements

Threats

Public Criticism and Negative Media Coverage

Legal Challenges and Lawsuits

Legislative Changes Affecting Funding

Security Breaches and Incidents

Health Crises

Conclusion

This study illuminated a massive correctional complex by understanding the Miami-Dade County Corrections and Rehabilitation Department. It emphasizes multilateral correction, security, and reintegration of convicts. MDCR’s well-developed rehabilitation courses show the likelihood of favorable results and reducing recidivism. These strengths show the necessity of staff training, development and rehabilitative services (Smith, 2021). The study pinpointed areas of concern such as overcrowding and cost of operations. This is why it is necesssary to notate these weakness to enhance the effectiveness of the department. Reduction in overcrowding through nonpunitive measures and efforts towards improving administrative capacity through technology are signs of further development (Morgan et al., 2019). These actions will improve the conditions in which individuals are confined and benefit the department’s financial status.

Considering the opportunities and threats mentioned in the SWOT analysis for further planning is logical. More funds could be secured through grants, or the university could collaborate with outside organizations to boost the capacity of the department (Cullen et al., 2017). It is also vital to manage risks, such as legal risks and unwanted external communication (Cullen et al., 2017). This evaluation has also reinforced the significance of the systematic and planned approach towards corrections. Managing internal threats and leveraging external opportunities can assist MDCR in promoting its image, the rehabilitation program increasing the inmates’ positive results, and guaranteeing organizational viability (Cullen et al., 2017). These outcomes will guide future processes and actions toward the achievement of the vision for the department as a leader in innovation in corrections and rehabilitation.

References

Allen, T. (2019). Condoning Unspeakable Things. https://doi.org/10.1086/701718

Allison, J. (2019). Values statements: The missing link between organizational culture, strategic management, and strategic communication. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 27(3), 666-689. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOA-08-2018-1501

Bankins, S., & Waterhouse, J. (2019). Organizational identity, image, and reputation: Examining the influence on perceptions of employer attractiveness in public sector organizations. International Journal of Public Administration, 42(3), 218-229. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2018.1423572

Boitrelle, F., Shah, R., Saleh, R., Henkel, R., Kandil, H., Chung, E., … & Agarwal, A. (2021). The sixth edition of the WHO manual for human semen analysis: a critical review and SWOT analysis. Life, 11(12), 1368. https://doi.org/10.3390/life11121368

Carter, T., López, R., & Songster, K. (2021). Redeeming justice. Nw. UL REv., 116, 315. https://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/illlr116&div=14&id=&page=

Cullen, F. T., Jonson, C. L., & Mears, D. P. (2017). Reinventing community corrections. Crime and Justice, 46(1), 27-93. https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.1086/688457

Dey Ravena, A. M. (2019). The Implications of Overcrowding for Fostering Prisoners in Prison: Management and Systems Problems. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 54(5). https://doi.org/10.35741/issn.0258-2724.54.5.38

Dzhengiz, T. (2020). A literature review of inter-organizational sustainability learning. Sustainability, 12(12), 4876. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12124876

Fitzsimmons, A. B., Qin, Y. S., & Heffron, E. R. (2022). Purpose vs. mission vs. vision: persuasive appeals and components in corporate statements. Journal of Communication Management, 26(2), 207-219. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCOM-09-2021-0108

Harris, C. B. (2021). Miami-Dade County Status Offenders: A Literature Review of Punishment and Rehabilitation of Youth. Contemporary Issues in Juvenile Justice, 11(1). Retrieved from https://digitalcommons.pvamu.edu/cojjp-contemporaryissues/vol11/iss1/1

Kantabutra, S. (2020). Toward an organizational theory of sustainability vision. Sustainability, 12(3), 1125.https://doi.org/10.3390/su12031125

Latessa, E. J., & Lovins, L. B. (2019). Privatization of community corrections. Criminology & Public Policy, 18(2), 323-341. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9133.12433

Lăzăroiu, G., Ionescu, L., Andronie, M., & Dijmărescu, I. (2020). Sustainability management and performance in the urban corporate economy: a systematic literature review. Sustainability, 12(18), 7705. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12187705

Link, T. C., & Reece, B. (2021). Barriers to the adoption of technological innovations in corrections: A review and case study. International journal of offender therapy and comparative criminology, 65(2-3), 262-281. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X20952396

Mbatha, L. S., Luthuli, L. P., & Masenya, T. M. (2020). Prison breakthrough: use of information systems in correctional facilities. Journal of the South African Society of Archivists, 53, 54-64. 10.4314/jsasa.v53i1.4

Miami-Dade County. (2023). Miami-Dade County Corrections and Rehabilitation History. Retrieved from https://www.miamidade.gov/global/disclaimer/about-miami-dade-county.page

Miller, A. A., Therrien, W. J., & Romig, J. E. (2019). Reducing Recidivism: Transition and Reentry Practices for Detained and Adjudicated Youth with Disabilities. Education and Treatment of Children, 42(3), 409–438. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26736483

Mittelstadt, B. (2019). Principles alone cannot guarantee ethical AI. Nature Machine Intelligence, 1(11), 501-507. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-019-0114-4

Morgan, R. D., Van Horn, S. A., MacLean, N., Hunter, J. T., & Bauer, R. L. (2019). The effects of imprisonment. The Wiley international handbook of correctional psychology, 61-77.47(1). https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119139980.ch4

Novisky, M. A., Narvey, C. S., & Piquero, A. R. (2022). The keepers: Returning citizens’ experiences with prison staff misconduct. Criminal justice and behavior, 49(7), 1010-1030. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854821102889

Papadimitriou, A., & Schiffecker, S. M. (2023). Looking good or doing good? Define the US university’s public mission by analyzing mission statements and strategic planning. The TQM Journal. https://doi.org/10.1108/TQM-10-2022-0313

Ravasi, D., Rindova, V., Etter, M., & Cornelissen, J. (2018). The formation of organizational reputation. Academy of Management Annals, 12(2), 574-599. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2016.0124

Rundle, K. F., & Talpins, S. K. (2020). 21st Century Prosecutions—Miami-Style Smart Justice. Justice Evaluation Journal, 4(1), 131–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/24751979.2020.1819014

Smith, H. P. (2021). The role of virtual reality in criminal justice pedagogy: An examination of mental illness occurring in corrections. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 32(2), 252-271. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511253.2021.1901948

Appendix A

Organization Vision Statement

“Our goal is to provide a safe, secure, and sanitary environment that focuses on the inmate’s reform and their ability to become productive citizens. Through such initiatives as community participation, incorporation of technology, and environmental conservation, we hope to create a correctional system that is the epitome of professionalism, honesty, and transparency. We promise to innovate and strive to serve the population better and protect the community of the county for the better.”

Appendix B

Organizational Mission Statement

“The main objectives of the Miami-Dade County Corrections and Rehabilitation Department include ensuring the safe and humane detention of inmates and providing effective rehabilitation programs to minimize the likelihood of ex-offenders returning to prison. It is our policy to embrace the use of technology in the delivery of services, engage the community, and uphold the principles of efficiency, accountability, and responsibility in the care and management of inmates and employees as well as the welfare of the society. By hard work and teamwork, we aim at establishing a correctional system that delivers justice, restores offenders, and improves the safety of the society.”

Appendix C

Organizational Value Statement

Blog