Rubric for GELO essay assignment: Criteria 9-10 points 8-8.9 points 7-7.9 points

Rubric for GELO essay assignment:

Criteria

9-10 points

8-8.9 points

7-7.9 points

1-6.9 points

Thesis: Create a well-developed thesis that can be supported by the evidence.

States a clear, strong thesis at the end of the first paragraph that can be supported with the available primary sources.

States a thesis at the end of the first paragraph but lacks in precision or clarity. Still, the overall point of the paper is clear throughout.

Thesis is present yet it is not stated clearly. Hints at the thesis without stating it overtly.

Thesis is inaccurate, biased, cannot be proven with evidence at hand. Thesis is absent.

Clarity: Avoids use of “I,” “we,” and other such personal pronouns. Uses active voice rather than passive voice. Clear about who did or wrote what, when, and where. Subsequent references use family name. Avoids spelling and grammatical errors.

Writing is clear and concise; follows the “tips” including those outlined in the criteria for clarity. Points are easy to identify.

The writing and arguments are clear. Did not follow 1-2 of the criteria outlined. Main points can be identified.

Meaning can be understood, yet the writing lacks clarity. Did not follow 3 or more of the criteria outlined.

Writing is unclear. Numerous typos, grammatical errors, and/or does not follow criteria.

Organization: Present information clearly and accurately through the effective selection, organization, and analysis of content.

Follows guidelines for organization in Tips.

Follows most of the guidelines for organization in Tips.

Follows some of the guidelines for organization in Tips.

Does not follow the guidelines for organization in Tips.

Specifics: Evidence is used to support the main idea or argument. Identify the most significant and relevant facts, definitions, and concrete details for the purpose at hand. Use examples, specifics, or detailed accounts.

Specific, accurate details are included. The quotations selected are relevant to the thesis. The paper explains the meaning of the quotations and how they help support the thesis.

Specific, accurate details are included. Most of the quotations selected are relevant to the thesis and help to support it.

Most of the details are accurate. The connection between the selection of evidence and the thesis is unclear.

Vague, general statement. Selects evidence that is not relevant to the thesis or evidence is absent.

Source Analysis: Effectively recognize how time, place, and perspective influence standards of evidence, objectives, and methods of thinking and communicating.

Effectively analyzes the source within its historical context. The analysis is well explained and accurate.

Analyzes the source within its historical context. The analysis is explained and accurate, yet some minor errors might exist.

Analyzes source but the historical context is not fully considered. Analysis might not be fully explained or accurate.

Analysis is inaccurate or absent.

Context: Demonstrates understanding of an event, person, or idea within historical context; matter at hand is considered and connected to the broader picture.

Demonstrates understanding of an event, person, or idea within historical context; matter at hand is considered and connected to the broader picture.

Demonstrates understanding of an event, person, or idea within historical context; matter at hand is considered but the connection to the broader picture is not fully developed.

Identifies an event, person, or idea but does not effectively place it within historical context.

Inaccurate information or context is absent.